The bear market is hard for every protocol, that’s why Cosmos ZERO team offers tips and tricks for crafting a governance proposal that meets the market conditions.

Keeping Native Tokens Strong

During bear market conditions, protocol leadership is encouraged to discuss with Regen Network whether native tokens used to purchase carbon credits can be held by Regen Network over a period of time, to ensure greater native token price stability across the Cosmos ecosystem. Reach out to the team in the Cosmos ZERO telegram chat, and we can set up 1:1.

Offering Proposal Alternatives to Your Community

To offer your community multiple alternatives to craft your proposal we recommend including the following polls in your governance discussion in Commonwealth. Based on their responses, governance proposals can be scaled down to meet community appetite in the bear market.

Question 1: What portion of Nature Carbon Ton vs City Forest Credits should we offset with?

→ 100% Nature Carbon Ton (NCT): This is the most cost-effective approach.

→ 80% NCT: 20% City Forest Credits: This is a medium cost approach.

→ 50% NCT: 50% City Forest Credits: This is the most expensive approach.

Question 2: How long should we offset our carbon footprint?

→ Since testnet: Longest time frame (can still claim net-zero)

→ Since mainnet: 2nd longest time frame (can still claim net-zero)

→ 2022: 3rd longest time frame (on the pathway to net-zero, but can’t claim net-zero yet)

→ 6 months: 4th longest time frame (on the pathway to net-zero, but can’t claim net-zero yet)

→ 3 months: 5th longest time frame (on the pathway to net-zero, but can’t claim net-zero yet)